Is Singapore having monarchy system?

I believe Singapore is not the monarchy people perceived.

Why people say Singapore is a Monarchy(Lee Dynasty) is because Lee Hsien Loong is Lee Kuan Yew's son (male line, Y-chromosome). When Lee Kuan Yew retired (seen as abdicated) Lee Hsien Loong ascended with Goh Chok Tong as seat warmer in between.

What make Singapore not a monarchy is PM do not make law as he wish like monarchy do. In Singapore, law need to go through legislation for debate to be gazetted. Although PAP won majority all the time and PM have big influence on the law making process but he is not absolute. Not even like US President where he can issue Executive Order, Singapore PM can't.

Singapore PM do not have the legal immunity or at least not at the same level as monarchy do. One of the distinct characteristics of monarchy is legal immunity.

Singapore PM is chosen by merit. Not only he need to be competent but also corruption-free and having high moral virtues. This is not require for monarchy. Whereas, traditionally monarchy is purely pass down by bloodline. Their successor need not be chosen because of education achievement and moral virtues. They are either pre-determine by monarchy tradition or favour from this parents.

Also because of the above, monarch normally delegate their administration role to professional who competent to handle nation affairs even they hold title like Prime Minister, Chef Command of Army and President. Whereas, Singapore PM and Ministers were chosen for their competency and expertise that they are there to perform.

https://youtu.be/cn_nJmMoO6gOf

course, there are monarch system that have election by elites to chose the King. Malaysia Negeri Sembilan is one of the kingdom where Sultan(King) is chosen by elites where competency, personal quality and a list of criteria is assess from a few of the royal bloodline. 

Sweden monarch is voted by people through referendum.

Source:Elective monarchy - Wikipedia (Elective monarchy - Wikipedia)

North Korea is calling itself republic democracy(DPRK, Democratic People's Republic of Korea). Kim was elected and election was held where he was voted by the people but the country is no where near democracy. The throne belong to Kim family since independent. From his grandpa to papa to him. There's no doubt it is a Kim dynasty. It is more Communist than any country on earth now.

Whether Singapore is Monarchy or not is not important, more important is the people is having good life. Only wealthy nation wealthy people have freedom of choice. I don't think Singapore has a monarchy. Lee dynasty is just what local folks talks. Even it is a monarchy it is not a problem as long as the country is well managed. 

So it is all labeling. There's no absolute democracy and Communist but surely there's some absolute monarchy country.

Is Native American's rights equal to Malay special position/privileges?

Native American indeed have some special privileges but not like the one(Affirmative Policy/NEP) in Malaysia. Native American special rights is afforded to them for their tribal survival akin to customarily land afforded to Orang Asli in Malaysia, the purpose is for their survival because unlike us, they don't live in modern economy system thus special rights is given to them to preserve their culture. This is unanimous across the world.

*Malay ≠ Orang Asli (Malaysia’s aborigines)

Native people that live in their primitive culture don't use money and don't really care about the financial system we are having. They grow their own food and build their own shelter like their ancestor did thousands year ago. They are unable to buy land to continue their culture thus land and others resources is afforded to them in order to continue their culture.

Reason? We can not be so sure our way(modern economy) work. Modern life is stressful and cancer is known a modern age illness. Our financial system go up and down and tumbling down kill many people. Although it is still the best we can think of and evolved into, we can't be so sure.

Democratically and in the eyes of humam rights, they should have a fair share of the land and resources since freedom of homestead their way is human right. It is also a cornerstone of democracy to respect freedom of religion& minority's rights. Co-existence is essential, if it is justifiable to designate area for biodiversity protection especially for endanger species, no reason to evict native from their land and deprieve their choice of lifestyle.

https://youtu.be/93wGaGFUnTs

They would have to work, do business like anyone else or even trade their music or culture for money when they come into capitalist world.

The NEP in Malaysia is undemocratic, inhumane and outright apartheid. Malay are not living in the jungle, they are living in modern economy where money is use to buy things. Hence, affirmative Policy It is not only a persecution on the non-malay but undermining the Malay by making them a fool for certain individual political gains. It is malicious, selfish and unethical, and this is applicable to politician background from Malay, Chinese, Indian and others races.

https://youtu.be/MJQcCw2Qo4E

Source:

https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/12/14/logging-has-destroyed-our-land-say-orang-asli

Malaysia Orang Asli is always being bullied. Despite the law give them customarily land but they are always being betrayed by government that sold/lease their land without even their acknowledgement. This is how ruthless and barbaric Malaysia government operate.

There's also force conversion in order to access to Orang Asli own rights.

https://youtu.be/U47j2dS6C_I

I do hope Malaysia have mature leader that genuine think and act for the people. Not misuse their power to enhance their position for more politics money.

https://youtu.be/FlzO_Fgg5_g

Malay is Muslim and Islam do not have spiritual value. Malay original religion and culture is very spiritual but Islam is just opposite. Islam is a prescriptive religion that ingrained politics and materialism for domination in the ideology, prescribed law to dictate life rigidly whereas spirituality is connection between inner self to God or nature which devoid in Islam country’s Islamism.

The old malay world is spiritual. They believe in spirits, spirit in stone, wood, keris, house and so on. They are animalism and they have shamans (bomoh) that pray for rain and cure illnesses. But the Malay now don't. Malay now is Muslim and bully other races.

https://youtu.be/HLn0MTKlwbU

Not only malay distorted from their own tradition the government also not allowed them to use malay name that connected to nature.

Extreme Islamism in Malaysia is eroding malay identity while persecute others race akin to robbery. Malay no longer spiritual and no longer depend on natural harvest for subsistence. Malaysia NEP are now preying on non-malay for financial gain that are neither democratic nor can be found in any financial system that works.

*Malay is not the first settler in Malaya. The first people settled in Malaya is Orang Asli (Negritos, Semang, Senoi)that migrates directly from Africa 65,000 year ago. Malay arrived 3,500 year ago.

Malay Not Malay

 Malaysia citizen is not "Malay" but "Malaysian". Malay is defined as a race who profess in Islam, habitually speak Malay and practising Malay custom. This implied any citizen who fulfill the conditions is eligible to be Malay thus allowed to enjoy the same special privileges of Malay. Malay herein is a race that bestow special position under article 153. Later when Sabah and Sarawak merged with Malaya to form The Federation of Malaysia (Malaysia), Lord Cobbold commission a report and eventually made others indigenous people of Sabah&Sarawak to enjoy the same benefits as Malay special position except for Malay reserve land. 

Source:https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/ctheme&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09&bul_id=MDMxdHZjWTk1SjFzTzNkRXYzcVZjdz09

Non-Malay like Chinese and Indian are the next biggest population minority in Malaysia who are being systematically marginalized especially after May13 massacre where NEP (New Economy Policy) were introduce in 1971 to further exacerbate the matter and reaffirm the apartheid state. 

Question here is what is Malay who left Islam? since they are no longer Malay. 

what are they after convert out of Islam? 

Nonetheless, profess in islam is not the only criteria to be Malay under article 160, as mentioned above. Malay must habitually speak Malay and practising malay custom which I would argue here most people here don't, therefore fail to fully comply with the criteria of being Malay. As a result, they are not entitle to enjoy the special position (NEP) empowered by article 153 of the Constitution because they are not considered as Malay. 

Most Malay nowadays no longer use Malay ethnic name but instead choose to adopt Arabic name and naming structure which is foreign to Malay tradition and custom. For instance, Ibrahim, Ali, Iskandar, and Khatijah. These name are in Arabic language. Is it necessary for Muslim to adopt Arabic name? The answer is no. 

Why people that adopt Arabic name instead of Malay failed to comply with article 160, as Malay? 

https://youtu.be/4BzrE8RF20I

1. Arabic exist before Islam. Arab used Arabic name even before Islam exist and they were Christian, Jews and Pagan then. Therefore, Arabic is not exclusive for Islam and Arabic name&naming structure (using patronymic that is foreign to Malay custom). This imply a person who adopt Arabic name not necessarily a Muslim.
2. Although Islam use Arabic for preaching, passing down by verbal tradition and written the Quran but Islam do not made compulsory for Muslim to adopt Arabic name therefore, adopt Arabic name is not necessary to be a Muslim. In Indonesia, where the world largest population of Muslim is inhabited do not use Arabic name. Some Muslim still use Sanskrit name such as Siva and Vishnu. 
3. Malay have own tradition and custom for naming. Malay ethnic have own name, such as Suria, Intan, Kiambang, kasturi, Rimau& Tuah. Hang Tuah is a well known Malay warrior in Malaysia. Therefore, purposely not using malay name is rebel and deviat from Malay tradition and custom. 

This also imply malay who don't use Malay name failed to be categotize as Malay by-law (under Constitution) and shall not enjoy the special privileges despite being a Muslim. 

I personally condemn the racist Constitution article 153&160. It is racist to discriminate a race and what more absurd is to use religion, language and custom as key definition of the race that determine their citizen's privileges while openly practising race-based communal policy that apparently impede the nation from progress ahead. Not only this create a second class citizenship (minority that deprieve from equal opportunity) of minority that keep on divide the nation and make true harmony and peace among races impossible but it also lead to nepotism, cronyism and kleptocracy to permeate in every  corner of the public sector as well as force private sector to play along in order to survive in the country. Thus, corruption will never end because the policy and Constitution itself is moulded in such a way to encourage and made corruption indispensable for living. 

I had tried all my best with resources available to me to take advantage of this lacunae to correct the wrong objectively. My objective is clear which is to make all people none Malay (equal). Over in Sabah and Sarawak, there's no such thing as NEP or bumiputera privileges despite they are entitled by law, under the Constitution, because literally all the people in Sabah and Sarawak are indigenous thus no distinction is made. I hope Malaya can resemble the racial harmony of the two Borneo States by remove all people from being Malay race and create a Malaysian race that we are, Malaysian, regardless of ethnicity and background, share the same identity as a nation. 

Will Sabah invite foreign power to colonize Sabah?

 I do not think Sabah would invite British to colonize it again since it had gained self-government status even before federated into Malaysia. Sabah is capable of self-governing and it may join Sarawak as a twin pack if they decided to secede from Malaysia. Unless, it is being invaded and colonize again and then I believe Sabah will be more wiling to accept British than Malaya to rule over their resources.

British present in South East China Sea will make China nervous since Sabah have territory issues with China 9 dash nine territory claim. The overlapping territory may be small compare to China with the rest of ASEAN country but if it is overlapping with British then tension in the region will be heightened multiple fold and British will need to have good reason to colonize Sabah while not spoil its imaging in protecting the sovereign against China.

I do not think British would like to colonize Sabah and Sabah will not like to be colonize again by anyone. It either remain in Malaysia or independent as sovereign by itself or plus Sarawak.

The Constitution British& Malaya established has been amended more than 600 times and problem is what need to be ratified according to MA63 thereafter the merger with Sabah (North Borneo), Sarawak and Singapore didn't fully materialise, even after more than half a century formation of the country!

Even those ratified into the Constitution is not adhere to. I don't think those yet to ratify will attract any attention of the federal government. Whether ratify or not, Malaysia should never ignore MA63 because without which Malaysia can not exist.

The race in this regard have to separate bumiputera into two different group, the Sabah&Sarawak indigenous and Malaya Malay. Bumiputera was something coined out to disguise Islamization, not a word in the Constitution. Malaya Malay are defines as those who profess in Islam, habitually speak Malay and oberseve Malay custom. Whereas indigenous from the two Borneo states are by phenotype(birth right) that do not need to observe culture practices to be one. Interestingly, Malay also found to be one of the indigenous of Sarawak which means Malay from Sarawak might not need to profess in Islam.

While both indigenous of Borneo states and Malaya Malay are all included in the newly coined term “bumiputera” but most of the people near 100% in Sabah and Sarawak are indigenous and they don't practice the NEP 6% discount for housing things thus NEP literally meaningless in the Borneo states. Unless they migrate to Malaya then their bumiputera status is useful. However, when they migrate to Malaya, the repercussions is not only a population shift but also a shift of land ownership where their previously owned land is sold to suit their economy life in Malaya. The lack of business opportunity and career advancement as a result of federal government unwilling to develop Sabah Sarawak in Borneo is forcing them to emigration.

Sabah and Sarawak population is inherently low. The MyKad project played by Mahathir is displacing local population percentage in Sabah with Muslim from Philippines and Indonesia. I'm not sure this is how Mahathir intend to islamize Sabah in order to gain control but people there is not only suffer from lack of economy development as a result of unfair budget from the federal but also impacted by the immigrations of poor third world population that erode the job market and economy there.

58 years already, what contains in MA63 is not adhere to. The most obvious is offshore territory that suppose to belong to state administration is being looted and manipulated under Continental Shelf Act 66 that were amended in 1969 during the proclamation of emergency. Petronas as a government owned private entity under federal government control is siphoning the wealth from Sabah and Sarawak to Federal Government. Giving back only 2%. By right it is another way round where federal government may receive up to 10% of the wealth derived from oil control by state. The 10% wealth allow to be given to federal might be for sovereign protection under federal, education system and infrastructure building such as telecommunication, broadband, electricity, clean water supply, highway and so on which federal government neglecting the two states yet still taking all their oil wealth.

While Sarawak established Petros to take over the role of Petronas from Sarawak territory in 2018, it is still a huge gap from what have to be restore since the illegal licensing for extraction by the federal government, if the state decided to bring it to court and won.

Sabah is still in limbo. Datuk Jeffrey Kitingan is the only MP fighting however federal government has been given a Federal Minister position to him purportly to brought him over to silence him to reclaim and restore Sabah wealth.

Malaysia has been operating unconstitutionally. Politician are not above Constitution even if they may have some leeway on law. Acting unlawfully, undemocratically, unlawfully is considered subverting the country and eroding the sovereignty.

There's lot of dirty politics tricks. They are extremely cunning(smart on the wrong way). They should use their brain for real economy development regardless of race, fair&honest socioeconomy development and most importantly their do job ethically (not abuse power for money and plot cronyism at international scale). From state government such as Taib Mahmud to Federal Mahathir, Malaysia have it all….

What do 'bin' and 'binti' means in Malay name?

There's no 'bin' and 'binti' or 'ibn' &'ibnat' in Malay names. They are not Malay per se.

Malay in Malaysia have lost their identity despite great effort asking people to follow Malay custom and language but themselves are distorting from it.

Bin& binti have a very sexy origin from Arab. It is a nasab (نسب) or patronymic rather than family name to distinguish their father. It was a side effects of their fond for orgy party. Back in those days Arabs breed like rabbits. An Arab women can be sex with multiple men and men of course enjoy sex with more than one women thus in order not to confuse and avoid inbreeding they adopt patronymic in their naming structure.

Not only the use of patronymic is from Arab origin but the name itself is Arabs, not Malay original language.

Bin and Ibn means ‘son of'. For example Ali bin Abu means Ali son of Abu.

Binti, Bte, Ibnat means ‘daughter of’. Example; Siti Binti Khatijah means Siti daughter of Khatijah.

Using patronymic is good for the Malay because they unable to control their lust. This is exabeted by Islam rules to hide female body parts that might make the Muslim society more tempting to use violence for domination or fulfill their lust, thus rape. Kelantan and Trengganu having the highest population of Malay Muslim is also the states having the highest traffic in pornography. . Whereas Ipoh and Georgetown having the most Chinese& Indian (non-muslim) population is having the least pornography traffic.

Of course, Patronymic not only used by the Arab, Greek also use them and purpose is the same. To identify father. Arab is also one of Semitics language family along with Hebrew, Aramaic, Akkadian..Etc . that's why they are not so different with name in Christian bibble. e.g. Ibrahim=Abraham, Islandar= Alexander, Yusof=Joseph, Daoud=David, Mariam= Marry. Christian however adopt surname or family name which I think more secure in terms of avoiding inbreeding because inbreeding still happen using patronymics on third generation or between cousin but family name ensure the entire family will not marry each other. This also assure natural selection do its work and better gene for next generation and human survival.

Malay ethnic name are such as Kiambang, Intan, Tuah. Perhaps the only malay still recognize by Malay is Hang Tuah.

The Malay are gradually becoming Arabs, from their name to attire. All for the sake of their frenetic to appear more superficially holy (suci). Some even started to wear turbans! I'm not sure when the Malay shift to ride camel.