Showing posts with label Carbon Sequestration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carbon Sequestration. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 September 2018

Mass Engineered Timber (MET) a sustainable building materials for NTU's THE MOONSHOT


I would like to congratulate Nayang Technology University of Singapore for announced the "The Moonshot", a six storey wooden campus, 40,000 sq m GFA(Gross Floor Area), costing S$180 million. The Mass-Engineered Timber building come with a price tag of S$4,500/ sq meter (GFA), double of average construction cost using reinforced concrete, S$925 to S$1,165 (as of 2015 Primary& Secondary school) or S$2,854 to S$3,152 if compare with shopping mall construction cost per square meter as of 2017. 

Arcadis: Cost Index year 2015.

Note that I derived S$4,500 from GFA instead of construction area which the two are different though negligible. The cost comparison also didn't take into consideration of the cost index of the period. Broadly speaking, timber building is 1.43 to 4.8 times more costly than building built with reinforced concrete.


So what make the highly efficient Singapore chose to invested in the timber building? What more it is (The Wave) the biggest of its kind in Asia. 

I personally very proud of Singapore for pioneering the modern wooden building. It will act as a yardstick for future building to follow suit, at the same time building local industry expertise in wooden building construction. Nonetheless, my support only applicable if the materials is sourced from sustainable manage forest, certified by FSC(Forest Stewardship Council) or equivalent. 

What so great about wooden building that still stay reasonable despite its high price tag?

Many would argue that isn't chopping down trees is bad for the environment? It is true if not done properly. Unsustainable logging will cause lost of biodiversity, flooding, landslide, soil erosion, water pollution, lost of carbon sequestration potential of the forest and land (yes, land also sequestrate carbon) and carbon emission. Others negative impact directly affected human are loss of shelter for the indigenous people, loss of livelihood(hunting and small scale agriculture), loss of source of water. 


The coming 2020 Olympic games stadium in Japan for example is an unfortunate story for the rainforest. There are at least 4 Japan based NGO protest and pursue the unsustainable source plywood from Sarawak for the Olympic stadium construction. However, government from both country is mute and blind about it as though they never acknowledge any petition and protest on the matter. The disappearance of pristine rainforest and suffering of force eviction of the indigenous settlement is irreversible. 

Cash is King here!

Forest that support 1.6 billion people is losing it presence by 30 million acres every year and contributed to 20% of the world carbon emission. Reality is sad, despite FSC is meticulously designed to be environmentally and socially just but its adoption is only up to 10% of the world total working forest. Ten basic principles of FSC reflect the holistic approach of the certification yet there is little motivation for government around the world to make it into by-law. For some egoistic reason or what not, different country may want to create their own certification with their own logo but the bottom line is the content. These certification may mutually recognise each other to have the same effects and gain wider acceptance worldwide since timber industry is very much an international business.

The Ten Principles of FSC are:

PRINCIPLE 1:

The Organization shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations and nationally-ratified international treaties, conventions and agreements.

PRINCIPLE 2:

The Organization shall maintain or enhance the social and economic wellbeing of workers.

PRINCIPLE 3:

The Organization shall identify and uphold Indigenous Peoples’ legal and customary rights of ownership, use and management of land, territories and resources affected by management activities.

PRINCIPLE 4:

The Organization shall contribute to maintaining or enhancing the social and economic wellbeing of local communities.

PRINCIPLE 5:

The Organization shall efficiently manage the range of multiple products and services of the Management Unit to maintain or enhance long term economic viability and the range of environmental and social benefits.

PRINCIPLE 6:

The Organization shall maintain, conserve and/or restore ecosystem services and environmental values of the Management Unit, and shall avoid, repair or mitigate negative environmental impacts.

PRINCIPLE 7:

The Organization shall have a management plan consistent with its policies and objectives and proportionate to scale, intensity and risks of its management activities. The management plan shall be implemented and kept up to date based on monitoring information in order to promote adaptive management. The associated planning and procedural documentation shall be sufficient to guide staff, inform affected stakeholders and interested stakeholders and to justify management decisions.

PRINCIPLE 8:

The Organization shall demonstrate that, progress towards achieving the management objectives, the impacts of management activities and the condition of the Management Unit, are monitored and evaluated proportionate to the scale, intensity and risk of management activities, in order to implement adaptive management.

PRINCIPLE 9:

The Organization shall maintain and/or enhance the High Conservation Values in the Management Unit through applying the precautionary approach.

PRINCIPLE 10:

Management activities conducted by or for The Organization for the Management Unit shall be selected and implemented consistent with The Organization’s economic, environmental and social policies and objectives and in compliance with the Principles and Criteria collectively.

I belief Singapore, in this context is genuinely wanted to be showcase how wooden building is parallel, if not exceeding, the quality of conventional building construction. In comparison to reinforced concrete, timber has relatively lower weight ratio and able to perform the same fire resistance if properly treated and designed. Unlike reinforced concrete, instead of emitting carbon timber itself is a carbon sink store as much carbon as 50% of its weight. Trees sequestrate carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and use it for body building. Of course, not only the trees in the forest serve as carbon sink the soil on the forest serve the same purpose too thus it is important to manage forest sustainably because wipe up the forest irresponsibility not only lost the potential carbon sequestration from the trees but the carbon sequestration potential of the soil too. Likewise, if manage sustainably, trees is harvest when reach Optimum Rotational Age or Maximum Sustainable Revenue and replanting of trees to ensure regeneration of carbon sequestration potential by aforestation(plant trees at area not a forest)or reforestation while meeting the business objective (profitable).    

The YouTube Video reveal how Sustainable managed forest to achieve both economy and environment objectives. Therefore it is almost certain that timber is a better choice as building materials if source from sustainable managed forest. The question that bugging me is whether land on earth is enough to supply for all human needs if would to build with wood? what is the break-even point for forest to cope with demand? is there technology that expedite the production of timber without negative side effects? Human population will hit 9.6 billion in year 2050, the world need answer for the future as much as solving the current problem otherwise we might not even have chance to see the future coming!


Not only wooden building technology improved tremendously to cater for the market needs but conventional building materials such as concrete and steel also evolving to become more environment sensitive. Conventionally, not only cement do not sequestrate carbon but its power intensive production and process that convert calcium carbonate into lime and CO2 as by-product is main reasons for 900kg of CO2 emission for every ton of cement produced. Concrete is made out of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), aggregate, sand and water. A 14% cement content emit up to 410kg/m3 of carbon dioxide which is approximately 180kg/tonne for a concrete mix with density of 2,300kg/m3. With the introduce of Fly ash, a by product from coal power plant generator, can replace up to 30% of cement content in the concrete mix effectively reduce carbon dioxide to 290kg/m3. One of the main culprit for the need to fire temperature to 1,500 °C is alite (Ca3SiO5), an ingredient of cement that responsible for early curing (gain strength) of concrete. to reduce the intensity of fossil fuel for that kind of temperature Belite (Ca2SiO4) is an alternative for replacement which can do the same tricks at 1,200 °C however it is not for sure Belite is greener since it take more energy to grind and require more time, like a few days even months to cure, though it yield greater strength than alite. Magnesium can be added to expedite the setting. Other than changes within cement, innovative ways to reduce CO2 is to pump liquid CO2 before the concrete mix thus making it storing carbon into the concrete. 

In general, wood is still far superior as a building materials in terms of environmental friendliness, as well as, bring others benefit such as reduction of heat island effects in the urban area and healthier (if not treated with harmful chemical). 

It is said that wood is link to spiritual property in many custom belief from the North West Viking to far East Japan and our very Malayunesia (Nusantara- Malay world). 

MET(Mas Engineered Timber) is 30% lighter than concrete and has higher strength-to-weight ratio than concrete and steel, allowing The Wave spanning 3 basketball court or 13 badminton court equivalent distance without any internal column. Prefabrication of MET component reduce 25% of manpower and labour cost saving which is a way to improve productivity. Needless to say, it is more sustainable, not only itself act as carbon storage, to as much as 50% of its weight, but the nature of its fabrication allow smaller trees instead of large piece of solid dimension lumber to be used thus matching sustainable managed forestry. Unlike the old days, MET is treated to be more durable from moisture and termite invasion, better fire resistant and thermal insulation. it chars at 0.75mm per minutes instead of burn like what we imagine for BBQ. As for The Wave, it  have 50mm allocate for the purpose hence 66.6minutes (~1hr) equivalent of fire resistance before fire meet MET's core.

To learn calculate the Carbon store in the wood, go to http://www.forestry.state.al.us/howMuchCarbonHaveYourTreesStored.aspx

*General assumption is 1 cubic meter of wood equal to 1 ton of CO2 stored thus prevent CO2 from release into atmosphere and cause climate change. 

MET give an example that sustainable construction materials may be found in primitive materials. Others natural building materials are bamboo (have faster growth rate), earth(adobe and mud,), strawbale, hemp and stone. There are 2 billions people in the world still living in mud houses and there is every reason for it, from thermal comfort, affordability to cultural value. Green materials in the recent decades such as used tire (earthship house), glass bottle, aluminum cannes, plastic, ICF (Insulated Concrete Foam) and others recycled materials is used as building materials. Not only it is not any lesser meeting the functional requirements of building in comparison to the conventional building materials but offer benefits such as divert waste from landfill, reduce GHG emission, and provide very affordable option that contribute to social growth.  

Reference:

https://www.bca.gov.sg/keyconstructioninfo/others/intl_constrn_cost_1q17.pdf

https://ic.fsc.org/en/what-is-fsc-certification/principles-criteria/fscs-10-principles







https://blog.i1machines.com/four-reasons-why-engineered-timber-is-the-building-material-of-the-21st-century-76795ff68e2d

*The blog is solely created and maintaining with my own resource. No obligation, any amount of ex-gratia is very much appreciated.

Maybank (Malaysia)account number : 1643 1529 3268 (Tay Kian Guan)

Wednesday, 27 April 2016

Plead for the 16 trees marked "x" along Jalan Ara, Bangsar, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.




(Refer to http://www.thestar.com.my/metro/community/2016/04/25/marked-trees-on-jalan-ara/)

I've written to KL's Mayor, Datuk Hj. Amin, to plead for the life of 16 trees along Jalan Ara which are on the dead-roll. The reason?

Due to proximity to the road, people are afraid it will fall and hit their vehicle or people. Another reason is obstruction to pedestrian especially handicap or OKU(Orang Kurang upayah). 

However, I think there's more can be done to achieve the equilibrium between society needs, environment protection and economy viability. And obviously the trees should be save!

First, there is the forgotten MS1183& MS1184 which already merged into MS1184, a code of practice for accessibility for the built environment. In the first instance, the pedestrian walkway should not designed in such a way (non-compliance to accessibility code). Nonetheless, if the designer were a bit creative or on the ground, he or she should have make use of the drain area as part of the pedestrian path. Simply by cover the drain with galvanized steel grating or concrete culvert will solve the problem.

Trees not only act as free oxygen machine, it also sequestrate carbon and act as carbon sink to store carbon. in another word, it make our world colder, cooler and climate more stable. Especially century old trees in the tropical area which provide 28% of world oxygen.

So how to justify the cutting of trees if the fault is not with the trees? the trees exist long before the road or pedestrian path. It is the questionable consultant who didn't designed it logically.

Compliance of MS1184 has been questionable since its inception. Literally, my experience with Malaysia's Architect& Engineer is not very favorable. Most of them, especially the young one, have no idea about the existence of UBBL and what more Accessible code or Universal Design which I picked up from my working experience in Singapore.

In Singapore, Accessibility Code is very much adhered to. HDB spent billions of dollars in upgrading their government apartments for the compliance. Another also very important code for design is CPTED.

CPTED stand for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design which I also encountered in Singapore. Malaysia have a similar set of CPTED guideline published under Town Planning authority which is another myth it seems disappear into the thin air. I do hope town council and city council start audit the existing building and regulate it into Building Plan submission& CCC approval.

In Malaysia's CPTED, plants should not grown over 0.8m or trees branches should lower than 2m. it's to have a better natural surveillance and openness so theft or whatever can't hide or do their notorious things. While planting edible plants like chili or flower plants allow either public to have free food or bees to have theirs. If harvest is a problem then ginger plants would be nice as it is optional to whether you want to harvest or just let it be.
Hydrophobic coated pedestrian
I also suggested the new pedestrian path to be painted with hydrophobic paint where surface coated with it repeal water and would be fun if painted infographic on the path about environmental protection, save water or things like that.

Sustainable development come with three elements; Social, Environment& Economy. We shouldn't chop the trees (favor social, neglect environment) or close the pathway for trees (favor environment, neglect social) or spend a deal of money to make over-bridge or fancy things.

Think simple!



There are numerous ways earth regulate itself. Plants and soil is one of the best way to store carbon (carbon sink) and stabilized the climate. Fossil fuel that give life to our transport is suppose to R.I.P.(Rest In Peace) and should be doing so since we have the technology to replace it.